![]() “Yes, but hasn’t that problem been solved?”, I hear you ask. Given that the GPS system was designed for an open battlefield and not for high functionality in a dense urban environment, it’s amazing these things worked in our cameras at all. Later incarnations wouldn’t geotag at all unless the satellites had been acquired, resulting in a large percentage of vacation shots having no geolocation data at all. Some early GPS cameras handled this problem by geotagging photos using the last known position which often led to a large percentage of vacation shots being geotagged with old info. ![]() It can sometimes take between 15 seconds and 10 minutes (depending on how much you’ve moved since the last successful position lock) to get a new lock, and very often you can get the shot and turn the camera before the GPS lock can happen. Well, the GPS receiver in cameras can do no better than these early units. (Garmin and TomTom had the market share for devices like these.) It could take up to 10 minutes before it could acquire signals from enough satellites to infer its position properly! Frustrating indeed. To understand the problem, think back to the earliest GPS units you could buy for your car. I think I know why this is, and I also have some recommendations on alternatives which work better than what’s possible in a camera. Manufacturers have been quietly discontinuing this feature without explanation. Have you been lamenting the loss of a built-in GPS receiver in the most recent batch of newly-introduced cameras?. More information about the seminars and why they're so important can be found at /seminars. I'm still working on logistics on all of these, so if you want to be put on the notification list, please fire off an email to Gary at Friedman Archives dot com. Here's what's on the schedule for the rest of 2015: Just returned from a month traveling and giving seminars - first in Boston, then in Nashville. This is a lot handier than carrying a wireless flash with you everywhere like I used to do! :-) (The wireless flash is in my right hand.)īoston and Nashville seminars – and what’s next Then, turn on the flashlight on your mobile phone and hold it at arm's length. Step 2) Turned on the smartphone's flashlight, handed it to the subject, and had her hold it in “Rembrandt position” – 45 degrees up, 45 degrees to one side: Step 1) without a flashlight, put the camera into manual mode and adjusted the exposure so the background looked the way I wanted it to look (see below):įirst, set your exposure so the background looks the way you want. Now in this instance the background was mostly black and so the camera's automatic exposure was going to get it wrong. Here's another example, taken at the Chattanooga Aquarium. The results were "wireless flash without the wireless flash":Īnd since the camera didn't think a flash was being used, it exposed for the background properly without me having to dial anything in. She reached into her purse, pulled out her smartphone, invoked the "Flashlight" app (which turns on a bright LED on the back of her phone), and held it at arm's length. Right after this my wife Carol, who has listened to me lecture about the benefits of wireless flash for nearly a decade, had a great idea.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |